not to put too fine a point on it but they actually interpret more than just mindlesly applying. Probably a major reason why drawing up legislation takes so long. For instance
The part of the (non-“online-news-media-content-creator” parapharsed*) judgement I saw actually refers to “Health Establishments” - that changes the practical implications dramatically from only hospitals to many more buildings needing to be in line for getting the local reticulation network changed to allow single loadshedding exemption or getting generators, installation, fuel, staff training, liability mitigation for damage due to equipment malfunction, maintenance etc.).
Also, the judgement refers to “all reasonable steps” - that will probably keep legal scholars and philosophers busy way past the point where we mere mortals will lose interest.
`* This time parapharsed is used intentionally
probably the one thing everyone will agree on 
/ 
/ 
/ 