Likely they fired the guy with the bad outlook, bad for the morale. More likely tho, they still thinking they can improve on things and there is less likelihood of things failing. It’s just linear thinking plus lots of pressure from the R4 Million watch wearing man… and those managing an election.
And one day, once we have V2G and V2H, you will buy a car and get the inverter and batteries “for free”, financed by the bank to boot.
That’s actually an interesting experiment to do with an anti-EV South African who is ranting about how it will never work because load-shedding: Ask them how they feel about the idea of the car also being backup for the house…
Why I’m not installing more batteries… One day (big if) if I get a car then V2H/G is my go to. Even a golf cart (I’m a golfer) could and should be added to my bank… (one with 48V lithium) - when the cart is not in use.
I am convinced I can influence takealot prices by looking at a particular product for a day or two in a row…then often it goes on “special”. So, keep checking, you could drive the woolies milk price down even further → Eat you heart out Elon/dogetwitter
Eskom is cooked and local council corrupt/incompetent etc. no dispute. Eskom most likely do not want to lose out on revenue (it definitely would have improved since Rural Maintenance took over the supply in the Mafube council).
It still remains interesting to see how these battles play out and how this is seemingly about eskom wanting a town to not use their own solar plant to help themself. This looks a bit disingenuous though.
Eskom allowed rural maintenance to trial their own load shedding implementation
The “Frankfort PV Independent Power Project” apparently has a PV capacity of about 3.8MW and 1MWh battery (solarMD if curious)
Frankfort apparently has a peak load of around 6.5MW.
So, from a purely practical perspective what happens with unexpected bad weather or load changes when loadshedding is required on the national grid level - Frankfort is not independent from the National grid yet. How does eskom plan around this? What SLA is in place?
Something else that I also think still needs attention in general are the notions of corruption/revenue protection etc. The “Frankfort PV Independent Power Project” consists of Rural Maintenance and 20 shareholders that raised around R100 million for this specific project.
The current loadshedding schedule that Rural maintenance implements makes a differentiation between residential and industrial customers.
Will there exist checks and balances for the little guy in the street vs the wealthier shareholders when/if (unlikely) we go full private? Will the ability to sway decisions suddenly be renamed corporate strategy, while in the state we call it theft and corruption? This question is not specifically about Rural maintenance and also not meant to suggest anything untoward about their dealings - their being in the news just make the numbers easier to find to use as examples.